Coy

Park Slope Wheels

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Friday Evening Cruise

Just Backdated

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Things You Cannot Blog About:

Not blogging
Anything other people might find boring
Things you may have mentioned before
Opinions that may be misconstrued
Opinions that start out being as a Great Analogy but get overcomplicated to avoid being misconstrued
Flippant stuff if you haven't blogged in ages
Serious stuff if you haven't blogged in ages
Work
Internal Marriage Functionings and Machinations (apart from the last post - IMs don't count)

So! This results in, rather unsurprisingly, a lack of blogging that's gone on for aaaaages. So screw it, frankly.

I went to Philadeplhia with Krissa and Beth and Josh last weekend. Josh's band, Heads Up Display, were playing a gig at the Grape Rooms in Manayunk.
Manayunk! There's a place in the world called Manayunk.
We had a great time. We saw the queue for the Liberty Bell (it was HUGE you guys, you should go see it for yourselves, it was really impressive), and the Philadelphia Art Museum, which does a much better impression of what Greece Must Have Looked Like In Its Prime than the tiny models at the Parthenon, with the sad exception that the Philly architect built in sandstone in an area with a healthy coal-burning power industry, so his creation will probably go down the road of impressive architectural decay more rapidly than its distant marble counterparts. All the people doing Rocky Balboa impressions at the top of the long run of steps were funny to start, tiresome after the tenth or twelfth, and then sort of sad, but not as bad as people who drove past the Rocky statue at the bottom of the steps yelling ADRIAAAAAN! and disappointingly maintaining excellent control of their cars.
The GPS with the Mary Poppins accent died as we arrived in Philadelphia:
Turn left.
Recalculating.
Turn left, then turn left, then keep left.
Recalculating.
Drive point three miles
Battery Low
Thank god for that
so we navigated our way home via assumption that New York would be easy to hit and when that failed, Google Maps on our new iPhones. This of course meant that those batteries died but by that time we could see the Empire State Building so aiming at the city was back on the cards.

My schizophrenic work iTunes library is on shuffle and just played three songs in a row beginning with 'Sugar':

Sugar Mountain: Neil Young
Sugarless: Caviar
Sugar Magnolia: Grateful Dead

I have no idea what the odds are of that happening.
I have 5456 songs, so 1/5456x1/5456x1/5456, I suppose, or 6.15x10E-12 or 1 in 163 billion. Maybe. But then that's the odds of any three song combination coming up. It's only because I spotted a theme afterwards that makes it unusual. Maybe we should downgrade probability for only being impressive in retrospect.

It's goddamned hot and humid at the moment. Our apartment's main air conditioner is struggling to keep up. The compressor just takes whole evenings off. Everyone assumes that as a building design engineer I know everything about air conditioners, but I don't get paid to pick window units out of the Home Depot catalogue. I could sketch out a scheme for the whole apartment block in a day or so that'd cost a couple of hundred thousand bucks but when it comes to the smaller bits of kit, after learning that it Makes Things Colder I'm judging it on how nice the front bit looks just like everyone else.

I have just eaten my lunch - it was a ham sandwich.

There. Bases covered.
1:03 PM me: Just ate and now have no motivation
  boo

6 minutes
1:09 PM Krissa: what'd you have for lunch?
1:11 PM me: BISON
  (one half)
  Only 54,300 calories!
  It's very lean.
1:12 PM Krissa: hahahahah
1:13 PM me: and a mango and black bean salad on the side
  for Health
 Krissa: hurrah!
1:16 PM i'm ordering a chop't -
  i'm absolutely slammed today
1:17 PM what comes from being less than spectacularly productive this week.
 me: Garrr maybe I need sugar?
 Krissa: by the way, DRAW?
 me: I have a headache and all sorts
 Krissa: brazil portugal DRAW?
 me: DRAW?
  Oh
  Neither of them could be bothered!
 Krissa: i can't BELIEVE it.
1:18 PM BRAZIL!
 me: Brazil got fewer yellow cards
  so there's that
1:19 PM First time they haven't scored in a World Cup game since about 1970
1:20 PM omg
  I'm dying
  omg
  ruby ruby ruby RUBY! Ooh arr ooh arr ooh arrrr
1:21 PM Krissa: HAHAHAHHAHA
  who ARE these people.
 me: The Wurzels!
1:22 PM Oi've got a brand new combine harvester, and Oi'll give you the key
1:23 PM Krissa: HAHAHAHAHAH
  veh funny
1:27 PM me: No?
  That's another of theirs
 Krissa: yes i remember
  are they, what, like a polka band
1:28 PM me: OH MY GOD
  I MARRIED AN AMERICAN
  WHAT HAVE I DONE

Formula vs Perfume

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Formula VS. Perfume by Heads Up Display from Carlos Molina on Vimeo.

Digg this video

Heads Up Display are great - check out their site here!

Google Voice!

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
I asked, and received. I am signed up for Google Voice, who now field my voicemails, and send me a transcript via email and SMS, and provide me a natty interface online where I can go and listen to my messages if the button prompts on the actual telephone are too slow for me.
Unfortunately the transcripts are not perfect.
This evening Krissa was meeting with Shana for a drink before heading home.
This is the voicemail she left, with Google's transcription.

Krissa: Hey! It's me. I just left the bar where we had the incredibly expensive cocktail at.
BECAME
Google: Hey! Give me an a plus. The borrow that we had a currently of the cocktail ass.

Krissa: I put it on my debit card and Shana gave me cash
BECAME
Google: Hello my darling carbon Cheney give you cash

Krissa: So anyway, I'm running really late and I've had a gin and tonic and it's ten to eight! I'm really really sorry. I thought it would - I thought it would be more like coffee...and it is not. So I'm walking up to Herald Square, I'm gonna jump on a D and then I'm coming home and having to make rotisserie chicken with croutons and stuff when I get home, but if um, you wanna have something else that's easier then I guess we can it's just then the bread will go to waste and the lettuce.
BECAME
Google: So anyway, I'm really late. James, I can't. Hey something really really sorry. I thought I would. I thought it would be more like off a and it's not so I'm walking up hills where I'm gonna jump comedy and then I'm going home and having to make. We're just. Re-checking the time. If I get home, but if you we wanna have something else with the zero if you can just of the bridal the wake them a letter.


Krissa: I don't know. Maybe its....when you get home you turn on the oven and it won't take me that long for me to make that dinner and I should be home by 8.30. But anyway..rambling! Rambling! Gin and Tonic...in my brain!
BECAME
Google: I don't know, maybe. S. When you get home teaching on the island. It won't take that long for me to make that dinner and you know I should be home by 8.30. But anyway rambling! Rambling! Gin and Tonic entertainment!


Krissa: Love you! Do you like bread? [Eddie Izzard reference]
Google: If you...you know like.

No google, I do not know like.
So! If you watch this:



Then when you watch me doing something similar in the middle of this:

 

...it won't look so odd.

Yesterday in Central Park, Adam (an old university friend ) and I took part in a dynamic human sculpture, organized by Oxfam, Avaaz, and a host of other organizations, as part of tck tck tck. Tck tck tck is a campaign for an international climate change plan that is ambitious, realistic and -vitally- binding.

Many news organizations were sitting on top of the cranes, shooting away - so far I can only find stills, like this one, (AP/LA Times) of the starting hourglass, and then this from Reuters of the tck tck tck in the lower bulb...but I'm sure the video of the full transformation is coming.

Human Countdown in New York

I was part of Siberia.

This week is Climate Week in NYC. Events abound.

The COP15 talks in Copenhagen in December are our best hope for another Kyoto style agreement in the next few years. If an agreement is not made there and action taken, climate change will keep accelerating.

If you are not in New York but would like to get stuck into the effort, avaaz.org provides details of how to get involved in the Global Climate Wake Up Call, a campaign to help people communicate their concerns to governments worldwide before this week's UN Summit, and Copenhagen later this year.

And yes, I too think I look ridiculous.
Your point?


Oh, You Waster

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
The trip to San Francisco back in May was marvellous. So marvellous in fact that Krissa and I were completely seduced by the place and created half-baked plans to move there...how, where, when...who knew? But it was a pleasant enough mindset with which to enjoy the second half of our time there.
We met some wonderful people, checked in with a few old friends, and enjoyed the wonderful  hospitality of Anna and Bobbie, superstars both.

Okay, so that was June...it is now August. Where was I?

Oh, well right now I'm sitting in my apartment with a dully throbbing jaw after a rather brisk doctor levered two of my wisdom teeth out yesterday. 

But we were talking about June, so just for your closure Krissa's pictures of that trip are here and mine are here.
Done?
Good.

My sister and brother-in-law, Jemma and Tom, just came to stay for a week, which was great! I hope I managed to pack enough Americana and Newyorcana into the seven days. The trip was a surprise gift from Jemma to Tom for his birthday, and Krissa and I decided to add to it, by taking them both out on a boat trip around the harbor, on the Pioneer
It was a magical evening, being in such good company, so close to the water you could reach down and touch it, under an evening sky clipped only by skyscrapers and sailcloth.
I wish they'd been able to stay longer.

What else what else what else...

Oh! Work's going well. My flickr stream photos of work-in-progress buildings have been switched to friends and family only, just because of the usual concern of rights, distribution etc. But if you haven't, check them out, or, alternatively, the United States Institute of Peace webcam is up here for all to see. There are two cameras...one on the main trailer, the other on top of the taller crane. And to think that place used to be a really, really big hole...

Nano has a new squeaky toy (thanks Jem and Tom!). 
Krissa has a new clicky toy.

I would like to not have to be recuperating now, please.
You can say all you like about the wonders of modern medicine, but it seems the method of removing a tooth is as good as it gets - numb, slice, heave. I don't resent that, but SURELY you could vaporise it or something? Mini light-saber it out?
I'm feeling fairly lucid, but with a bit of a fuzziness of thought which means my attention span is realllly looong. Woo painkillers.
Let me rephrase that to woo painkillers I am taking very seriously and only when I need them woo.

In my daze I finished reading The Da Vinci Code this morning.
In my defence my recent reading list has included two Pratchetts I hadn't read (Going Postal and Making Money, both much better than I'd expected and something of a return to form after the long slew of Watch whodunits), Jane Austen and the Theban Plays of Sophocles.
So I think I earned the three days of guilty reading.
I don't know why I'm trying to justify myself to you, internet. Most of you have read Twilight, for which (so I am informed) you have no excuse whatsoever.

I just got the new Gomez album, A New Tide. It's very different, and while it was shiny-new-exciting to start, the later songs on the album sort of failed to maintain that excitement. I hope it grows on me...

What else have I got going on? What grand schemes?

Well...not much, really. 
Life is very good indeed, mind you.
I might volunteer to work the occasional weekend on the Pioneer.
That would be fun.

The Freedom To

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
The motto of the American South during the Civil War was Deo Vindice - God will vindicate, will justify - God is on our side.

God was not one of Abraham Lincoln's favourite subjects, but during that war he is attributed with saying, "...my concern is not whether God is on our side; my greatest concern is to be on God's side..."

You are not justified nor vindicated by a sanction from God, but regardless of the partisanship of any particular deity, what is right and good will be most God's 'side', and that goes for most people's' idea of God.

The watching world is filled with people avowing that the demonstrators represent the spirit of freedom and true democracy in Iran. Leaders are being urged to act to support them.

Regardless of the vigour and passion on either side of the electoral dispute, the only thing that matters here is that democracy and the will of the people is accurately carried out.

No democratically elected world leader can truly support either candidate, because it doesn't matter which wins, the democracy is flawed. Not through vote rigging, but through oppression of political opposition, free press, religious diversity and other freedoms.

Even if Iran opened the doors on its electoral process and everyone was satisfied that the true winner of the recent poll had become President, and the protests ceased, I would think it a shame because the thing worthy of true protest is the social system.

Many countries are guilty of attempting to manipulate others; throughout her history, Britain has been one of the worst. To step in and support a candidate in the context of an imposed, false democracy would be to validate the false democracy. 
The only request world leaders can make of those in control in Iran is that the people are well treated and that their right to protest is respected. If that is granted, when the act of protest is not a criminal offence, true protest might arise...which would be the end of an oppressive regime. The two are the same, and calling for the respect of protest is as likely to be heeded and just as ineffectual as calling for the dissolution of the oppressive regime right off the bat. 

But that is all that can be done without applying force, and that would make things much, much worse.

Krissa and I are going to San Francisco on Thursday. We shall be staying with some rather fabulous people and paying visits to many more.

This is a first and a couple of furthests for me - furthest from home, furthest west...first time seeing the Pacific, and of course first time to California. Another pin in the virtual map, some more turf explored...I am really excited!
To see the city, to see people, see giant redwoods...

Even if it takes me three hundred and sixty five times as long as Phileas Fogg, I'll get round the world eventually.
The UK has released a list of people who are barred from the country for "propagating views" that "fundamentally go against our values" according to the Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith.

I am seriously mixed up about this.

First, I read Fred Phelps is not allowed into the UK.
Undeniable satisfaction.

Second, a voice of moderate rational argument from Inayat Bunglawala:

“If they step over the line and break the law, it's at that moment the law should be enacted, not beforehand...If people are keeping their odious views to themselves, that's their business. We should not be in the business of policing people's minds."

I feel unease. That's absolutely true. And as far as I know, Fred Phelps, to run with an example, has not broken any laws in the United Kingdom. He is a notorious, vocal bigot with views many people find abhorrent. The fact remains that he has not broken any law in the United Kingdom.

By the time I read (at the bottom of this BBC article) that Martha Stewart had been denied entry to the UK because of her insider trading deal I was positively upset. This is dangerous, ridiculous, populist nonsense.

I've already quoted an excerpt, but this bears repeating:

“Coming to this country is a privilege. We won't allow people into this country who are going to propagate the sort of views... that fundamentally go against our values.”
Jacqui Smith - Home Secretary

I understand there have been attempts under UK law to prevent the instigation of hatred on racial or religious grounds, with varying levels of success or moral objectivity, but this particular quote rings with a dangerous tone of protectionism. If entering the UK is a privilege, there is a standard. This isn't a hint, this is precisely what the government is saying.

Even worse, the standard is vaguely defined as a contrariness to values. 'Fundamentally' is overused and is just as woolly as 'reasonable' and 'actual'. It's a dangerous word - you understand if someone is described as wrong. If they're described as fundamentally wrong, your understanding hasn't changed - but the describer has added nuance to how wrong the person is.

I do not think that the United Kingdom should have a monarchy.

It's a personal view. It crops up in conversation occasionally. I'm not an activist, but if the subject comes up I can get quite passionate about it. I don't know if I've ever changed anyone else's mind, but I may have done. I may have propagated my views.

(I don't want to go off on the explanation, but here is a part of it in a nutshell -  I think that the monarchy is a remnant of a time when we were not self-governed. The institution serves no useful purpose. Any minor purpose it does serve, it would be better as the duty of an elected representative. Even if we are now completely democratic, the monarchy and the royal family form such a grand part of our national identity that their cultural primacy skews it, deforms it, so that we are not modern or rational in our thinking about our place in the global community, or about our role as individuals in a global society...like I said. Part of the explanation.)

Anyway.

If, because the United Kingdom has a monarchy, we can safely assume that is a value or belief the United Kingdom holds...and I am against it.

I am against one of the values of the United Kingdom.

Am I fundamentally against it?
Well yes. You'll have to work hard to change my mind on the matter.

So...what now?

The satisfaction I felt when reading that Fred Phelps was barred from the UK is exactly the sort of feeling this announcement is designed to give. What it's not designed to achieve is the feeling that if I disagree with what the government feels is a cultural value (fundamental or otherwise) I can have my right (sorry) privilege to enter the UK removed.


So, Jacqui Smith - I am against the monarchy, and I've told people about it.
Can I come in?


I am feeling enormously cheerful and optimistic.
The huge surge in oil prices last year and the current financial crisis have given me a spring in my step and a newfound enthusiasm. This might sound callous and inconsiderate, especially since I have not directly felt their effects - I live in New York, I don't own a car and I'm lucky enough to still have my job. Millions of people in the world have been adversely affected, and yes I'm a bastard for saying this, but...I was expecting the events to produce this much change to be much worse.

So the status quo has been shaken - twice - and people are looking for a way out and finding one that was there, developing and improving, all along.

In May of 2008, the US government Energy Information Administration recorded a price of over $4 for a gallon of gasoline, a threshold that shocked a nation becoming increasingly uncomfortable with the cost of the fuel previously considered as a cheap, staple resource. 
When your fuel costs so much more, what are you going to do? Stay at home? No.

Sales of hybrids in America are rising in spite of the economic crisis - Toyota are doubling their allocations to the US market and I've seen an explosion of hybrid cars here in New York...perhaps aided in overcoming any negative social connotations by Mayor Bloomberg's decree that all NYC cabs must be gas-electric hybrids by 2012. 
It's interesting to see how the auto-makers, with their 2008 product lines stacked with giant SUVs and trucks, have reacted to this direction of consumer choice. Giant cars are what American consumers have been buying for years. 

The "luxury SUV" Cadillac Escalade weighs 5,700lbs (2,500kg) - about as much as a female African elephant. The 2007 gas-only model gets just 13 mpg in a city environment and 19 mpg on the highway. Hybrid technology on this behemoth improves its mileage to just 20mpg city and 21mpg highway. In an attempt to have the best of both worlds, Ford have produced the Escape, a more lightweight SUV-like car designed to be a Hybrid - and these get 34mpg in the city. New York's cab companies are buying Escapes in droves.

Imagine how much less gasoline would be used if designers (and the consumers who pay their wages) realized that there was an even better way...moving away from the family tank and back to the family car. What would the mpg be on a hybrid Smart car?
But baby steps...and this is all very encouraging.

Gas prices went below $4 again in August 2008. But hybrids made sense before the gas crisis, and they still make sense. The only thing that changed was that people were shocked into looking for a better way of doing things. And they found it.

---

Bank after bank has crumbled, jobs have been lost, purse strings have tightened. The old ideas about how the global economy works have been questioned. What are we working on again? Why are we working this way? Where are we generating value?

The statement released yesterday by the G20 leaders included some serious pledges and an outline of a planned path to recovery. The final pledge was this:

  • build an inclusive, green, and sustainable recovery.
Whole nations are shaken and looking for another way of doing things...and there, all along, standing in the political hubbub shouting at the top of its lungs but tragically unheard, was a logical, sensible, sustainable approach to energy, industry, development and economics. 

So what I hope I'm seeing is the different aspects of our society; the political, industrial, and social spheres, recognizing that yes, renewable energy makes sense. Sustainable practices make sense. Consuming more efficiently makes sense. Green economic growth can happen. Green economic growth makes sense.

As a realistic individual I have long acknowledged that it is not enough for green technology and renewable energy to be simply better for the environment. It needs to be better, economically, for it to develop in our society. It needs to be cheaper. The opportunity to invest in a wind farm needs to get investors' heart rates up. The market needs to drive these changes.

You can do this two ways - develop the technology to the point where the economic balance tips, and a wind generated Kilowatt-hour is cheaper to produce than a coal or nuclear generated Kilowatt-hour...or the economic goalposts can move and suddenly renewables are a better proposition. Subsidies for green projects are one way of moving those goalposts.

Another way would be to wait for total depletion of fossil fuels, global economic meltdown and health-threatening degradation of the environment to make renewable energy a promising investment. 
Call me heartless, but I think that would be much worse than what we are currently experiencing.

So a gas price spike and the mortgage crisis could be looked at as an early warning. Yes, the goalposts have moved...the global economic framework is changing. Hopefully just enough that the market can drive renewables and green practice as an engine for economic growth.

Maybe the technology isn't there yet for what Al Gore is calling for - 100% renewables in ten years - but technology tends to progress, especially when market driven. Social attitudes do not have to change. 
It might be my inner engineer talking, but I would rather have a technological problem to solve than a social one...and I think we're getting there on both fronts.

So cheer up, and cross your fingers. After the smoke clears...it might never come back.

Skyhooks

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

I Aten't Dead

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Contrary to all indications.

How are you? You okay?

And Then You Smile

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Okay so work work work, right?
Late night, early morning, working weekends, general disgruntlement, too much coffee not enough time too much to do.
But then fifteen minutes free over cereal and some internet and


Which I watched to begin with because the art style is awesome....and then the song had me tapping my feet and I was really enjoying it. The morning ceased to be another up-eat-shower-dress-and-go affair. Woo, I found a cool thing. But YouTube wasn't done with me yet. There are MORE OF THESE. 

Halfby, a band I hadn't heard of until I clicked on the link in Jeph Jacques' Twitter, have quite the following in Japan, it seems. At least, enough so that following gets to stop traffic if they feel like emulating their favourite videos...


And now I'm in a really good mood. 
Hmmm, I better sign off now - I have to go to work.

I might walk there.


If you can vote and you have yet to - don't make it a spectator sport for yourself too.
Get out and vote.
PALIN: Yes, Sen. McCain does support this. The chant is "drill, baby, drill." And that's what we hear all across this country in our rallies because people are so hungry for those domestic sources of energy to be tapped into.

(then, later...)

PALIN: So even in dealing with climate change, it's all the more reason that we have an "all of the above" approach, tapping into alternative sources of energy and conserving fuel, conserving our petroleum products and our hydrocarbons so that we can clean up this planet and deal with climate change.

Presumably deep in the prospective budgets of the Republican party there is an item like:


Tank, storage: crude oil.
Quantity: 1
Capacity: 4 billion barrels
Cost: Difficult to calculate
Purpose: Preserving petroleum products...above ground

There was also a contradiction in Governor Palin's successive assertions that human activity isn't responsible for climate change, that she encourages reduction of emissions in the US, and that we must encourage other nations to curb emissions "that America would not stand for".

China only recently overtook the US as the world's worst polluter...would I be wrong to suggest that it's a little soon to be mounting that high horse?

Tubes

| | Comments (2) | TrackBacks (0)
When the first episode of Pushing Daisies aired on TV, I was thrilled to pieces. Not only were the cinematography and art style playful and quirky, but the script was refreshing and unpredictable, and Anna Friel was finally back in my life. I loved it.

That's all I've seen to date. Even before the credits finished rolling on that first epsiode I was waiting for it to come out on DVD. Like a lot of people, I don't have a regular schedule; when it comes to being in front of a TV at the same time week after week, I don't even try. I'm not the kind of person who needs to see something NOW and there's plenty of other entertainment in the world to keep me occupied in the meantime. Krissa and I went back to watching our Netflix DVDs, and the current TV season carried on without us.

Occasionally, seeing a billboard for the Pushing Daisies on a bus, I worried.
Maybe it was too quirky, too unusual.
Maybe people weren't watching it.
Maybe it would be axed.
What could I do?
I didn't want to sit there watching the seventh and final episode on DVD, enraged at the brutal termination of yet another interesting show. Not again.
How can viewers communicate our desires to the networks?

The way in which my enthusiasm for a show manifests is that I bother to rent every disc in the series on Netflix rather than quitting and taking them all off my queue...which doesn't give any feedback at all to the stations...and by that time, why would they care? They sold the rights for DVD distribution for a fee based on TV ratings, and you're not giving their advertisers face time by watching a series on DVD.

This is the crux of the odd three-way relationship between advertisers, the television stations and the audience. They want completely different things and only care a little, in an indirect way, whether or not the other parties get what they want.

We the audience want entertainment with as little financial or time-sacrifice as possible. The TV stations want to sell advertising to make money. Advertisers only care about selling their products to make money.

When TV stations held all the cards, their audience contract was simple.

Watch the commercials, and in a minute you will be entertained.

By walking away from this contract we are almost cheating the system that creates our entertainment in the first place. By cutting the connection to the TV stations and renting the entertainment only when it is available to be viewed as and when I choose I am acting in my own self-interest - the way I get my entertainment is convenient and free of any time-investment requirement to watch advertising, something I am happy to pay a little money for.
I don't feel bad about this - the networks and advertisers will themselves only ever operate in their own interest, but technology has shifted the balance of power towards the viewer. This is of course great news for me - the contract is unevenly weighted in my favour - but I have put myself into a position where the choices of the remaining live television audience control what eventually gets down the chain to me, which, while not exactly a sacrifice (what is the real effect of an individual audience member in the ineffective democracy of television ratings?) disconnects me from that direct contact.

If I am willing to pay for convenient and advertising-free entertainment on alternative technology (DVD), the television networks might be able to use technology to tip the balance of values by offering a compromise.

Hulu.com has a library of shows and movies that can only be watched after an unskippable advertisement. This gives viewers the convenience and control of a rented DVD without having to pay for it, as long as we sit through the advert.
It's a technologically enabled redraft of the old contract, but with the scheduling removed.
Another plus is that with direct streaming media you are communicating directly to the television network what you like, which programs are good enough that you will sit through advertising. With an immediacy that bypasses the DVD release dates, that's something I can really appreciate.

Now that Krissa and I are once again coming to the end of the excellent and cruelly cancelled Firefly on DVD, and news is breaking about Joss Whedon's new show, Dollhouse, pausing in production and undergoing changes...I think this direct feedback will remove the feeling of lack of control that being part of an enormous 'television' audience induces.

Pushing Daisies is back for a new season, the DVD and I hope the second, third and fourth episodes are as good as the first. Hulu is great, but I'll still be subscribing to Netflix for a while - one, because of the deal that allows members to watch Netflix streaming media over Xbox Live, and two, because the networks haven't come round to my house and hooked up a computer to the television.

Call me uncompromising, but I'll only fully buy back into television when they figure out that the television itself is a redundant piece of equipment. We shouldn't have televisions in our living rooms any more. We should have computers, but computers linked to a library of advertising-supported entertainment at a better resolution and framerate than the current internet offers. And most importantly, in front of the couch.
...Kelloggs was a British company. I never for a moment thought the box I spent twenty minutes reading each morning with the 'By Appointment To Her Majesty' crest was anything but British. I never saw 'Road to Wellville'. Admittedly after reading Bill Bryson's description of the invention of the cornflake I had less of an excuse. Krissa loves to tell this story.

---

...'Oldsmobile' was slang for an old car. Who came up with that as a brand?

---

...fruit juice in a can was a stupid idea. I still think this.

---

...it would be weird if someone handed me a cup of coffee in a bag. I still think this.

---

...all American beer was regulated to 4% alcohol by volume or under. This is mercifully and incredibly wrong. Hurrah!

---

...I understood weights and measurements. Metric! Metric metric metric. I miss you so. Instead of beautifully interchangeable metres, kilometres, litres and so on, I have to wrestle with feet, slugs, fahrenheit, horsepower and British Thermal Units (hahahahahaha).
I have been reduced from (occasionally) working things out in my head to ALWAYS needing paper or a calculator, and more often than not, the internet as a reference.
Example:
1 British Thermal Unit is the energy needed to heat a pound of water by one degree fahrenheit.

Fair enough.

12,000 btus of cooling is called a ton of cooling. This is based off how much cooling can be done by a ton of ice. Historically - not so long ago that people were happy to sweat all day, but long enough ago that they weren't very good at preventing it, air conditioning was performed by dumping a large brick of ice in front of a fan and then pushing that cold air around a building.
So, perfectly naturally, 1 ton of ice = 1 ton of cooling.
All big AC equipment is still rated in tons.
And don't even talk to me about slugs.

---

...England was an English speaking country (I have since been corrected - NYU require prospective students of British citizenship to take an 'English as a Foreign Language' test if they wish to study there.)

---

...aliens came from outer space, when in fact I am one.

---





...

Two Types Of Snoozer

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Type 1

Phone: TIME TO GET UP!
Human: I want to sleep a little longer.

-a bit later-

Phone: TIME TO GET UP!
Human: I suppose it is.


Type 2

Phone: TIME TO GET UP!
Human: I want to sleep a little longer.
Phone: TIME TO GET UP!
Human: I want to sleep a little longer
Phone: TIME TO GET UP!
Human: Uhhhhhnnnflumphmeh
Phone: TIME TO GET UP!
Phone: TIME TO GET UP!
Phone: TIME TO GET UP!
Phone: TIME TO GET UP!
Phone: Screw this for a lark. Standing by.

-a bit later-

Human: ...uh what time is it?


It's tough when these two types of snoozer share a bed.

Early in the morning yesterday in Washington DC, on a narrow grass median where a highway off-ramp meets a crossroads, a man leant a large white stuffed bear against the traffic light pole. Let's call the man Tom, and we'll call the bear Dick.
Dick was dressed in torn and dirty clothing and was holding a sign that read 'S.O.S.'

Tom withdrew to the trees on the other side of the road to take pictures of Dick and the cars. For hours, on one knee or standing, he took photographs from many different places at the roadside, usually when the traffic lights were red and the space between him and Dick was packed with cars.

At about 11 o'clock another man crossed to the median.
Let's call him Harry.
So we have Tom among the trees with his camera, Dick the bear, and now Harry.

Harry stood for a moment, looking at Dick.
Dick and Harry were both dressed in tattered, weathered clothes, and Harry had a sign as well, a big one he held under his arm. To Tom's distress, Harry dropped his things in the grass and picked Dick up bodily. Carrying him under his arm, Harry crossed the second half of the street and propped Dick against a trash can on the pedestrian sidewalk and, leaving him there, made his way back to the median.
Harry's sign said, 'Vietnam Vet hungry and homeless please help'

Tom hung around for another couple of hours taking pictures of Dick in his new spot, without moving him. Now Tom took pictures when passersby could be seen reacting to Dick and his sign. At about 3 o'clock Tom picked up Dick and walked off. Harry stuck around.

So; two things.

Firstly, Tom and Dick. Or at least what I think Tom and Dick were all about - I didn't ask.
Congress is considering energy legislation this week.
The folks at wecansolveit.org think that if:

-you care about the recent elimination of the hugely successful and economically beneficial renewable energy industrial subsidies that have boosted the progress of renewable energy in the US
-you're concerned about the push for domestic US drilling being used as an excuse for continued reckless use of fossil fuels (the USA is using 25% of the world's oil and sitting on 3% of its reserves)
-you're a little vexed about the fact that we are on the brink of seriously fucking the earth up

...well then!
You should call your Member of Congress and tell them just that.
Here's how.
Don't use the word fuck like I did.
If you don't have a Member of Congress, call your local governmental representative.

Secondly, Harry.
I don't know what to say about Harry other than...peace and compassion - let them move you.

Downtown Manhattan is again today swamped with visitors attending the memorial service for the victims of the September the 11th attacks. The reading of the names is echoing in the streets near the former site of the towers. The mood is subdued and sad, but today I witnessed none of the aggression and appetite for vengeance I had seen, admittedly only at the crowd's fringes, at previous events. I hope that says something about how people feel, and not the police's policies on demonstrations at the ceremonies. I noticed a huge water cannon under covers in a nearby sidestreet in a row of waiting police vehicles.

A block from the WTC site, a wild-eyed man stared at me in my bank's lobby as I walked in. He was in the process of taping some home-made posters to the glass. I can't really remember who he blamed for 9/11, but the words 'INSIDE JOB' featured. I had just been walking through the crowds listening to the names, and I was feeling very emotional. Upstairs, I let the teller know, and she asked a security guard to go down and talk to the man.

Aperture Science

| | Comments (2) | TrackBacks (0)
I frowned at Google the other day. Not because of Chrome, although I'll get to that in a minute, but because Google - the search engine bit - wasn't being helpful.

It was trying, but failing.
It's a work example, but I hope you'll bear with me.

On Monday I looked up drycooler. I'm not a fan of them (engineers will, at this point, have to excuse the pun. everyone else, please carry on), they're inefficient but small.

Due to the unique way the google' 'history' function is wired and if you have it enabled, you'll get a different set of results to me when you click on that link. Chances are you haven't looked for them before, so this will be google's first stab at getting you what you want - Classic Google algorithm, original recipe.

Tuesday I looked them up again, and the page was different. The first page of results was thick with the links I'd clicked from Monday's results, regardless of where they'd been in the original line up.
Which would be great, if I was looking for the exact same information that interested me before, when in fact I was deliberately looking for more models, from more manufacturers, so it took me a while to get to the stuff I wanted.

"Ah, foolish Stuart," I hear you pointedly remark, "The Mighty Google has sorted all these things for you! Click one results page back and you'll be in virgin internet territory! Amen."

And you would have a point.

After a year of using google for my product searches, I will have enormously skewed my preferred results towards vendors I use a lot; the big equipment manufacturers that dominate the American market, and they will handily spring to the fore each time. But what is going on in that selection process? Are European vendors being screened out because I usually look at US sites, from a computer in the US? Is something I searched for in my lunch hour going to affect my work searches? 

If at 12.30 one day I search for 'Nike Air', look for fares on 'US Air', read a funny story in a pictureless Reuters 'Funnily Enough' story and then have to look up 'hot air balloon shaped like a banana' how are those 'air' themed searches affecting my 4.30pm hunt for 'steam air humidification systems absorption rate'?

It seems that making suggestions based on previous 'satisfactory' results is a narrowing-down of the possibilities of the internet. Chrome's built-in 'omnibar' suggests results as you type -from your previous history and 'popular sites even if you haven't visited them'...which could in future be google advertisers. Paid ads are clearly defined though the google.com interface, but not yet in the address bar suggestions...

I'm having difficulty articulating my problems with this, apart from the fact that it raises my net neutrality hackles - no one should be limiting your access to the internet, not even your past self.

Google History is an optional 'feature' that I've now turned off, but it seems to be somewhat warped way to run a search engine that can be adapted to so many unpredictable purposes by the same user. I think Google needs to worry less about giving people what they might want, and work on improving the ways in which they can do what they like.
Tools like calculator, the unit conversion aspect of which is a favourite of mine, the almost-but-not-quite-awesome "define:" function... things like that are turning google into a powerful query responder in its own right, not just a gateway to other people's information.

Trying to narrow that portal to point at a particular type of information can only be a bad move. Even if it's only a little more work to get at what you want, it's still a restriction.


August Shore

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

A few shots from a walk Krissa and I took along the coastal cliff path west of Ventnor on the Isle of Wight. It was very windy, and we got excessively rained on.

I didn't take pictures of those bits.
Krissa: actually, you know, i want to spend some time with you too - dinner out is better than dinner at home for that.
plus dinner out makes NO dishes.
i think i just want to try some place new maybe?

Sent at 2:49 PM on Friday


me:
Okay!

Sent at 2:50 PM on Friday


Krissa:
what are you in the mood for?
me:
Well of course, anything
but I think something vegetably and herby.
Like, experimental vegan or something
Nepalese
Bengali
Sumatran
any of the above

Sent at 2:52 PM on Friday


or steak
there
that gives you some wiggle room.
I finish a glass of water and stand up from the table to get a refill from the cooler.

Other Person: You know what they say about drinking water?
Me: What's that?
Other Person: That by the time you're thirsty, you're already dehydrated.
Me: I thought that was the point of feeling thirsty.
Other Person: No, no, you don't get it. By the time your body is telling you you're thirsty, you're already dehydrated. It's too late, see?

pause

Me: Riiiight.
Krissa is asleep; napping in the afternoon heat.
I made a big and happy show of revitalizing my blog - it's still a great thing to have and to not have it would feel strange, after six years, but I've also fallen out of the habit of writing posts. 

I have also, to be fair, been a little busy.
Let's just say that the amount of work I have means I am listed on a document somewhere in my boss' boss' computer as being about 180% committed at the moment. I shall be going in to work tomorrow. That's a Sunday.
On top of the 'serious' business, rehearsals for Much Ado About Nothing are now a nightly affair, meaning that I cannot work late to ease the 180%. And seeing as that 180% doesn't look like going away for a while, this might be the last time I can feasibly be in the Communicable Arts summer production... which makes me even more determined to do it this year, and do it as well as I can.

With work and play (haha) there's not been a lot of time for er...play. 
I have a PlayStation 3 now, but I have no games, and it's a model which isn't backwards compatible with PS2 games. I've installed Folding@Home, played a demo or two...and elsewise left it alone. It feels like getting a Ferrari and using it to pop down to the corner shop for the paper. Apart from the Folding@Home, which feels like getting a Ferrari and then using it to help...cure Alzheimers. Which I'm not sure Ferraris can do. But hey.

I've felt odd lately. Work is such a huge part of my life that I don't like to talk about in case my employers don't like me talking about it, but it's changing me, I think.
I'm an engineer. The only thing I've ever been utterly, directly, professionally passionate about is environmental change. I took a degree with a huge green engineering tilt to it. Now, I design building systems - heating, ventilation and air conditioning, in the world's most energy-happy nation. In a manner of thinking it makes sense - this is where the greatest improvements can and must be made...but I always envisioned myself rolling up my sleeves and building a dam or drilling wells in Africa; creating ingenious designs for essential devices that would improve the lives of the world's disadvantaged.
But in spite of that view of my future life, one of my professional idols has always been Reginald Mitchell. If it weren't enough that my grandfather flew his aircraft in the Battle of Britain, if it weren't enough that he is credited with one of my favourite engineering quotes of all time, I remember reading, in some musty old book, about his days before the design of the aeroplane that would become the Spitfire and the inspiration for the US Mustang. It described him in front of a vast drafting table in the late twenties, and the design teams for all of the projects at Supermarine would wait for some of his time. They would roll out their drawings, outline the problem, and in a few moments of discussion and sketching from Mitchell, they would be on their way to a solution. At the age of twelve or thirteen I read that and thought, "That's how my brain works! Quick, intuitive and clever. I want to do that."

I'm working on several projects at the moment. It's very tough, in terms of juggling project requirements and the like, but when the phone calls die down and a hour or so is free, there are a plethora of problems laid in front of me, and I dip in and fix something a bit, tend to something else, finish that first thing, send out the last, revise something we thought was finished last week, sign off on another thing entirely. 
And while it feels an entirely schizoid way to work, all that effort is aimed at producing two or three buildings that work; work better than most...consume less energy...harm the earth a little less.

So theoretically, being this busy is awesome.
It's changing me in that I don't feel the need to shy away from it - it feels tough, and unfortunate, yes, but I can see the need and feel the motivation - this is it, this is what I need to do.
One building at a time, two buildings at a time, three buildings at a time, four....

It's not the revolutionary, trail-blazing environmental career I envisioned in college; there's less glory and more hard work for one, but it's aimed in the right direction.
Italy knocked out of Euro 2008

Opponents of gay marriage stay quiet

I love the idea that these two 'news items' are connected.

Taken by Krissa

Mother Night on Amazon.com
I read this for the first time about ten years ago and, I'll be honest, lost track of what was going on. With a lot more Vonnegut under my belt I can say this is both one of the saddest and most penetratingly insightful of his books. Some of his other works are strongly flavoured by the horror of humanity's actions in World War 2, but this book largely eschews the normal satirical Vonnegutian flippancy when dealing with such grave and outrageous issues, and instead pores over the devastating personal effects of war, politics, art, love, patriotism and the mutability of human values.


Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

My Goodreads Profile

Twitter

    Follow me at twitter

    Flickr

    www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing public photos and videos from Kidsturk. Make your own badge here.

    Creative Commons License
    This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
    Powered by Movable Type 4.21-en

    Recent Comments

    • I agree totally. The...
      from Adrian (read)
    • I think, Adrian, tha...
      from Stuart (read)
    • I think Adrian's ana...
      from Tony (read)
    • I agree with you mos...
      from Adrian (read)
    • I'm a bit late to th...
      from jamie fae (read)
    • check out this reall...
      from Saltation (read)
    • tivo just hesitate ...
      from Saltation (read)
    • picking on the intel...
      from Saltation (read)
    • As an American, I ag...
      from srah (read)
    • I moved here from th...
      from Miss Lis (read)

    July 2010

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1 2 3
    4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    11 12 13 14 15 16 17
    18 19 20 21 22 23 24
    25 26 27 28 29 30 31