Google Voice!

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
I asked, and received. I am signed up for Google Voice, who now field my voicemails, and send me a transcript via email and SMS, and provide me a natty interface online where I can go and listen to my messages if the button prompts on the actual telephone are too slow for me.
Unfortunately the transcripts are not perfect.
This evening Krissa was meeting with Shana for a drink before heading home.
This is the voicemail she left, with Google's transcription.

Krissa: Hey! It's me. I just left the bar where we had the incredibly expensive cocktail at.
BECAME
Google: Hey! Give me an a plus. The borrow that we had a currently of the cocktail ass.

Krissa: I put it on my debit card and Shana gave me cash
BECAME
Google: Hello my darling carbon Cheney give you cash

Krissa: So anyway, I'm running really late and I've had a gin and tonic and it's ten to eight! I'm really really sorry. I thought it would - I thought it would be more like coffee...and it is not. So I'm walking up to Herald Square, I'm gonna jump on a D and then I'm coming home and having to make rotisserie chicken with croutons and stuff when I get home, but if um, you wanna have something else that's easier then I guess we can it's just then the bread will go to waste and the lettuce.
BECAME
Google: So anyway, I'm really late. James, I can't. Hey something really really sorry. I thought I would. I thought it would be more like off a and it's not so I'm walking up hills where I'm gonna jump comedy and then I'm going home and having to make. We're just. Re-checking the time. If I get home, but if you we wanna have something else with the zero if you can just of the bridal the wake them a letter.


Krissa: I don't know. Maybe its....when you get home you turn on the oven and it won't take me that long for me to make that dinner and I should be home by 8.30. But anyway..rambling! Rambling! Gin and Tonic...in my brain!
BECAME
Google: I don't know, maybe. S. When you get home teaching on the island. It won't take that long for me to make that dinner and you know I should be home by 8.30. But anyway rambling! Rambling! Gin and Tonic entertainment!


Krissa: Love you! Do you like bread? [Eddie Izzard reference]
Google: If you...you know like.

No google, I do not know like.
So! If you watch this:



Then when you watch me doing something similar in the middle of this:

 

...it won't look so odd.

Yesterday in Central Park, Adam (an old university friend ) and I took part in a dynamic human sculpture, organized by Oxfam, Avaaz, and a host of other organizations, as part of tck tck tck. Tck tck tck is a campaign for an international climate change plan that is ambitious, realistic and -vitally- binding.

Many news organizations were sitting on top of the cranes, shooting away - so far I can only find stills, like this one, (AP/LA Times) of the starting hourglass, and then this from Reuters of the tck tck tck in the lower bulb...but I'm sure the video of the full transformation is coming.

tck tck tck

I was part of Siberia.

This week is Climate Week in NYC. Events abound.

The COP15 talks in Copenhagen in December are our best hope for another Kyoto style agreement in the next few years. If an agreement is not made there and action taken, climate change will keep accelerating.

If you are not in New York but would like to get stuck into the effort, avaaz.org provides details of how to get involved in the Global Climate Wake Up Call, a campaign to help people communicate their concerns to governments worldwide before this week's UN Summit, and Copenhagen later this year.

And yes, I too think I look ridiculous.
Your point?


Oh, You Waster

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
The trip to San Francisco back in May was marvellous. So marvellous in fact that Krissa and I were completely seduced by the place and created half-baked plans to move there...how, where, when...who knew? But it was a pleasant enough mindset with which to enjoy the second half of our time there.
We met some wonderful people, checked in with a few old friends, and enjoyed the wonderful  hospitality of Anna and Bobbie, superstars both.

Okay, so that was June...it is now August. Where was I?

Oh, well right now I'm sitting in my apartment with a dully throbbing jaw after a rather brisk doctor levered two of my wisdom teeth out yesterday. 

But we were talking about June, so just for your closure Krissa's pictures of that trip are here and mine are here.
Done?
Good.

My sister and brother-in-law, Jemma and Tom, just came to stay for a week, which was great! I hope I managed to pack enough Americana and Newyorcana into the seven days. The trip was a surprise gift from Jemma to Tom for his birthday, and Krissa and I decided to add to it, by taking them both out on a boat trip around the harbor, on the Pioneer
It was a magical evening, being in such good company, so close to the water you could reach down and touch it, under an evening sky clipped only by skyscrapers and sailcloth.
I wish they'd been able to stay longer.

What else what else what else...

Oh! Work's going well. My flickr stream photos of work-in-progress buildings have been switched to friends and family only, just because of the usual concern of rights, distribution etc. But if you haven't, check them out, or, alternatively, the United States Institute of Peace webcam is up here for all to see. There are two cameras...one on the main trailer, the other on top of the taller crane. And to think that place used to be a really, really big hole...

Nano has a new squeaky toy (thanks Jem and Tom!). 
Krissa has a new clicky toy.

I would like to not have to be recuperating now, please.
You can say all you like about the wonders of modern medicine, but it seems the method of removing a tooth is as good as it gets - numb, slice, heave. I don't resent that, but SURELY you could vaporise it or something? Mini light-saber it out?
I'm feeling fairly lucid, but with a bit of a fuzziness of thought which means my attention span is realllly looong. Woo painkillers.
Let me rephrase that to woo painkillers I am taking very seriously and only when I need them woo.

In my daze I finished reading The Da Vinci Code this morning.
In my defence my recent reading list has included two Pratchetts I hadn't read (Going Postal and Making Money, both much better than I'd expected and something of a return to form after the long slew of Watch whodunits), Jane Austen and the Theban Plays of Sophocles.
So I think I earned the three days of guilty reading.
I don't know why I'm trying to justify myself to you, internet. Most of you have read Twilight, for which (so I am informed) you have no excuse whatsoever.

I just got the new Gomez album, A New Tide. It's very different, and while it was shiny-new-exciting to start, the later songs on the album sort of failed to maintain that excitement. I hope it grows on me...

What else have I got going on? What grand schemes?

Well...not much, really. 
Life is very good indeed, mind you.
I might volunteer to work the occasional weekend on the Pioneer.
That would be fun.
Krissa and I are going to San Francisco on Thursday. We shall be staying with some rather fabulous people and paying visits to many more.

This is a first and a couple of furthests for me - furthest from home, furthest west...first time seeing the Pacific, and of course first time to California. Another pin in the virtual map, some more turf explored...I am really excited!
To see the city, to see people, see giant redwoods...

Even if it takes me three hundred and sixty five times as long as Phileas Fogg, I'll get round the world eventually.
The UK has released a list of people who are barred from the country for "propagating views" that "fundamentally go against our values" according to the Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith.

I am seriously mixed up about this.

First, I read Fred Phelps is not allowed into the UK.
Undeniable satisfaction.

Second, a voice of moderate rational argument from Inayat Bunglawala:

“If they step over the line and break the law, it's at that moment the law should be enacted, not beforehand...If people are keeping their odious views to themselves, that's their business. We should not be in the business of policing people's minds."

I feel unease. That's absolutely true. And as far as I know, Fred Phelps, to run with an example, has not broken any laws in the United Kingdom. He is a notorious, vocal bigot with views many people find abhorrent. The fact remains that he has not broken any law in the United Kingdom.

By the time I read (at the bottom of this BBC article) that Martha Stewart had been denied entry to the UK because of her insider trading deal I was positively upset. This is dangerous, ridiculous, populist nonsense.

I've already quoted an excerpt, but this bears repeating:

“Coming to this country is a privilege. We won't allow people into this country who are going to propagate the sort of views... that fundamentally go against our values.”
Jacqui Smith - Home Secretary

I understand there have been attempts under UK law to prevent the instigation of hatred on racial or religious grounds, with varying levels of success or moral objectivity, but this particular quote rings with a dangerous tone of protectionism. If entering the UK is a privilege, there is a standard. This isn't a hint, this is precisely what the government is saying.

Even worse, the standard is vaguely defined as a contrariness to values. 'Fundamentally' is overused and is just as woolly as 'reasonable' and 'actual'. It's a dangerous word - you understand if someone is described as wrong. If they're described as fundamentally wrong, your understanding hasn't changed - but the describer has added nuance to how wrong the person is.

I do not think that the United Kingdom should have a monarchy.

It's a personal view. It crops up in conversation occasionally. I'm not an activist, but if the subject comes up I can get quite passionate about it. I don't know if I've ever changed anyone else's mind, but I may have done. I may have propagated my views.

(I don't want to go off on the explanation, but here is a part of it in a nutshell -  I think that the monarchy is a remnant of a time when we were not self-governed. The institution serves no useful purpose. Any minor purpose it does serve, it would be better as the duty of an elected representative. Even if we are now completely democratic, the monarchy and the royal family form such a grand part of our national identity that their cultural primacy skews it, deforms it, so that we are not modern or rational in our thinking about our place in the global community, or about our role as individuals in a global society...like I said. Part of the explanation.)

Anyway.

If, because the United Kingdom has a monarchy, we can safely assume that is a value or belief the United Kingdom holds...and I am against it.

I am against one of the values of the United Kingdom.

Am I fundamentally against it?
Well yes. You'll have to work hard to change my mind on the matter.

So...what now?

The satisfaction I felt when reading that Fred Phelps was barred from the UK is exactly the sort of feeling this announcement is designed to give. What it's not designed to achieve is the feeling that if I disagree with what the government feels is a cultural value (fundamental or otherwise) I can have my right (sorry) privilege to enter the UK removed.


So, Jacqui Smith - I am against the monarchy, and I've told people about it.
Can I come in?


I am feeling enormously cheerful and optimistic.
The huge surge in oil prices last year and the current financial crisis have given me a spring in my step and a newfound enthusiasm. This might sound callous and inconsiderate, especially since I have not directly felt their effects - I live in New York, I don't own a car and I'm lucky enough to still have my job. Millions of people in the world have been adversely affected, and yes I'm a bastard for saying this, but...I was expecting the events to produce this much change to be much worse.

So the status quo has been shaken - twice - and people are looking for a way out and finding one that was there, developing and improving, all along.

In May of 2008, the US government Energy Information Administration recorded a price of over $4 for a gallon of gasoline, a threshold that shocked a nation becoming increasingly uncomfortable with the cost of the fuel previously considered as a cheap, staple resource. 
When your fuel costs so much more, what are you going to do? Stay at home? No.

Sales of hybrids in America are rising in spite of the economic crisis - Toyota are doubling their allocations to the US market and I've seen an explosion of hybrid cars here in New York...perhaps aided in overcoming any negative social connotations by Mayor Bloomberg's decree that all NYC cabs must be gas-electric hybrids by 2012. 
It's interesting to see how the auto-makers, with their 2008 product lines stacked with giant SUVs and trucks, have reacted to this direction of consumer choice. Giant cars are what American consumers have been buying for years. 

The "luxury SUV" Cadillac Escalade weighs 5,700lbs (2,500kg) - about as much as a female African elephant. The 2007 gas-only model gets just 13 mpg in a city environment and 19 mpg on the highway. Hybrid technology on this behemoth improves its mileage to just 20mpg city and 21mpg highway. In an attempt to have the best of both worlds, Ford have produced the Escape, a more lightweight SUV-like car designed to be a Hybrid - and these get 34mpg in the city. New York's cab companies are buying Escapes in droves.

Imagine how much less gasoline would be used if designers (and the consumers who pay their wages) realized that there was an even better way...moving away from the family tank and back to the family car. What would the mpg be on a hybrid Smart car?
But baby steps...and this is all very encouraging.

Gas prices went below $4 again in August 2008. But hybrids made sense before the gas crisis, and they still make sense. The only thing that changed was that people were shocked into looking for a better way of doing things. And they found it.

---

Bank after bank has crumbled, jobs have been lost, purse strings have tightened. The old ideas about how the global economy works have been questioned. What are we working on again? Why are we working this way? Where are we generating value?

The statement released yesterday by the G20 leaders included some serious pledges and an outline of a planned path to recovery. The final pledge was this:

  • build an inclusive, green, and sustainable recovery.
Whole nations are shaken and looking for another way of doing things...and there, all along, standing in the political hubbub shouting at the top of its lungs but tragically unheard, was a logical, sensible, sustainable approach to energy, industry, development and economics. 

So what I hope I'm seeing is the different aspects of our society; the political, industrial, and social spheres, recognizing that yes, renewable energy makes sense. Sustainable practices make sense. Consuming more efficiently makes sense. Green economic growth can happen. Green economic growth makes sense.

As a realistic individual I have long acknowledged that it is not enough for green technology and renewable energy to be simply better for the environment. It needs to be better, economically, for it to develop in our society. It needs to be cheaper. The opportunity to invest in a wind farm needs to get investors' heart rates up. The market needs to drive these changes.

You can do this two ways - develop the technology to the point where the economic balance tips, and a wind generated Kilowatt-hour is cheaper to produce than a coal or nuclear generated Kilowatt-hour...or the economic goalposts can move and suddenly renewables are a better proposition. Subsidies for green projects are one way of moving those goalposts.

Another way would be to wait for total depletion of fossil fuels, global economic meltdown and health-threatening degradation of the environment to make renewable energy a promising investment. 
Call me heartless, but I think that would be much worse than what we are currently experiencing.

So a gas price spike and the mortgage crisis could be looked at as an early warning. Yes, the goalposts have moved...the global economic framework is changing. Hopefully just enough that the market can drive renewables and green practice as an engine for economic growth.

Maybe the technology isn't there yet for what Al Gore is calling for - 100% renewables in ten years - but technology tends to progress, especially when market driven. Social attitudes do not have to change. 
It might be my inner engineer talking, but I would rather have a technological problem to solve than a social one...and I think we're getting there on both fronts.

So cheer up, and cross your fingers. After the smoke clears...it might never come back.

Skyhooks

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Twitter

    Follow me at twitter

    Flickr

    www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing public photos and videos from Kidsturk. Make your own badge here.

    Creative Commons License
    This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
    Powered by Movable Type 4.21-en

    Recent Comments

    • I agree totally. The...
      from Adrian (read)
    • I think, Adrian, tha...
      from Stuart (read)
    • I think Adrian's ana...
      from Tony (read)
    • I agree with you mos...
      from Adrian (read)
    • I'm a bit late to th...
      from jamie fae (read)
    • check out this reall...
      from Saltation (read)
    • tivo just hesitate ...
      from Saltation (read)
    • picking on the intel...
      from Saltation (read)
    • As an American, I ag...
      from srah (read)
    • I moved here from th...
      from Miss Lis (read)

    February 2010

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4 5 6
    7 8 9 10 11 12 13
    14 15 16 17 18 19 20
    21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    28